cyndyishida wrote: > And, in the end, the folks debugging this (Ilya & co) are busy working on > clang header module reproduction and reduction tools: > https://github.com/emaxx-google/cvise/branches @emaxx-google
Interestingly enough, @vsapsai is also working on reproducers for explicitly built clang modules, and that is how he ran into the compiler bug about a not-included textual header. When discovering which files to capture for the reproduction, we technically shouldn't need to also include this header input since it's not needed to build the module, it seems like that principle would also help for reducing reproducers. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138227 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
