vsapsai wrote: > It is concerning to me that we as a company are given **a week** to adjust to > the change and there is no discussion either about alternative approaches or > the scale of the changes needed to support this. We do rely on all kinds of > weird behaviors and side effects in Clang, and are happy to adjust to make > the best for the community. I am pretty sure we can find a way to make this > work too, but not under undue pressure. Do you realize you can ask for a different deadline? If you don't tell how much time you need, you get an external deadline imposed on you.
What makes you think that no discussion is possible? For the record, "we need this to work, **you must** make it work" is not a discussion. > I agree that maintaining anything for a single company is not something that > the community must or should do, but we are also not asking for maintaining > this behavior indefinitely. Sorry, my bad, I've missed how much time do you need. I.e., for how long this behavior should be maintained. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138227 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
