kito-cheng wrote: > I prefer to keep the function signature as an auxiliary metadata with the > name riscv_lpad_func_sig, so future schemes and other language frontends can > reuse the riscv_lpad_label metadata flow and have the opportunity of not > being forced to adopt the idea of function signatures.
My point is I would like to see the signature string in IR, so that sounds good to me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111661 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
