NexMing wrote: > I tend to prefer @jeanPerier's suggestion of having the option name reflect > that only the LLVM dialect is being used. > > In the future, do you intend to provide a way to choose the set of dialects > to use? In that case, we could consider something a bit more general like > @tblah's suggestion.
Currently, using the LLVM dialect is only a temporary solution and doesn’t align with my long-term goals. In the future, I plan to implement conversions from FIR to scf, memref, and other core dialects. I personally prefer @tblah’s suggestion, but as @jeanPerier pointed out, I’m indeed not yet sure how to make a difference between the different levels of representation that the core dialects. I think the appropriate core MLIR dialects are those that most closely reflect the original FIR representation. Do you have any suggestions on how to approach this? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139857 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
