ojhunt wrote: Given that the original PR broke pointer auth discriminators for function pointers, can we verify that discriminators for vtable pointers and vtable pointer slots are still correct as well? I think what we might actually need is for mangling to be aware that it is being used for the purpose of constructing a pointer auth discriminator- (this would also make it possible for us to handle the problem of abi versions being included in the mangling of vtable pointer slots)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138947 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
