emaxx-google wrote: > I'm still not sure I understand the problem this is solving, but I also don't > see any harm in it, so I'm leaning towards accept here. Aaron can be the > final approval though.
@AaronBallman I'd like to proceed with landing this as a short-term fix for the nondeterminism issue we're hitting at Google, but if you have any additional feedback I'm happy to address it in a follow-up. (We're also very interested in investigating the actual underlying issues that lead to these subtle problems, but it'll probably take much more time.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137910 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
