erichkeane wrote:

> > Updated list:
> > ```
> > Disagreements on 'num_gangs' appearing >1x on kernels/kernels-loop 
> > (justification for kernels-loop should apply to kernels as well?) (UNK way 
> > forward right now)
> >     Clang :: SemaOpenACC/compute-construct-num_gangs-clause.c
> >   
> > FLANG: prohibits device_num >1x  (UNK way forward RN).
> >   Clang :: SemaOpenACC/init-construct.cpp
> >   Clang :: SemaOpenACC/shutdown-construct.cpp
> >   
> > Disagreement on 'bind' on a 'routine'. (UNK way forward right now)
> >    Clang :: SemaOpenACC/routine-construct-clauses.cpp
> > ```
> 
> In discussion, we decided that `bind` probably should follow the same rules 
> as "Implemented proposed change for 'routine' gang/worker/vector/seq. (see 
> issue 539)". So I'll follow-up on that after this.



We discussed/solved 'bind', so:
```
 Disagreements on 'num_gangs' appearing >1x on kernels/kernels-loop 
(justification for kernels-loop should apply to kernels as well?) (UNK way 
forward right now)
     Clang :: SemaOpenACC/compute-construct-num_gangs-clause.c
   
 FLANG: prohibits device_num >1x  (UNK way forward RN).
   Clang :: SemaOpenACC/init-construct.cpp
   Clang :: SemaOpenACC/shutdown-construct.cpp
```



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135372
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to