erichkeane wrote: > Updated list: > > ``` > Disagreements on 'num_gangs' appearing >1x on kernels/kernels-loop > (justification for kernels-loop should apply to kernels as well?) (UNK way > forward right now) > Clang :: SemaOpenACC/compute-construct-num_gangs-clause.c > > FLANG: prohibits device_num >1x (UNK way forward RN). > Clang :: SemaOpenACC/init-construct.cpp > Clang :: SemaOpenACC/shutdown-construct.cpp > > Disagreement on 'bind' on a 'routine'. (UNK way forward right now) > Clang :: SemaOpenACC/routine-construct-clauses.cpp > ```
In discussion, we decided that `bind` probably should follow the same rules as "Implemented proposed change for 'routine' gang/worker/vector/seq. (see issue 539)". So I'll follow-up on that after this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135372 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
