CarlosAlbertoEnciso wrote: > > > To work out which class A this refers to would involve parsing the > > > template parameter correctly and matching to the correct anonymous > > > namespace. While this technically isn’t impossible > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Anonymous types are confined to a single CU > > statically, but their values can definitely leak out at runtime. So if I'm > > stopped in a random CU and I see am object whose dynamic type is > > `(anonymous namespace)::X`, I don't see how one could determine which type > > (out of possibly many) is that vtable referring to. > > @labath I will double check with our debugger team.
>From our debugger team: "You could in theory look at the ELF File symbol for the VTable symbol to work out which CU the anonymous namespace refers to, which is why we say it’s *technically* possible. You’d have to transfer that information to the debugger during loading though which we don’t currently do." https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130255 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
