tromey wrote: `DW_AT_specification` has a fairly specific meaning in DWARF. I don't really understand why you want to link from the class type to the vtable (the reverse seems more useful to me), but I would suggest a new attribute, considering it is a new capability. The link from the class to the specific vtable even seems mildly incorrect, in that during object construction the vtable will go through several different values, not just one.
Also linking from the vtable object to a member of the class seems less useful than the `DW_AT_containing_type` approach, where the link is explicitly to the type and not some member. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130255 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
