melver wrote: > I only have a few comments about documenting the caveats (no alias analysis). > > The actual code changes look very simple and this looks like a clear > improvement that would catch many useful cases. > > I don't have much experience with this code and would still advise to wait > until someone more familiar with the code takes a look. But happy to give a > general LGTM after the documentation is improved.
Added the additional test and mentioned the (remaining) lack of alias analysis. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127396 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits