================ @@ -1841,15 +1841,21 @@ class ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl : public CXXRecordDecl, LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(TemplateSpecializationKind) unsigned SpecializationKind : 3; + /// When matching the primary template, have we matched any packs on the + /// parameter side, versus any non-packs on the argument side, in a context + /// where the opposite matching is also allowed? + bool MatchedPackOnParmToNonPackOnArg : 1; ---------------- mizvekov wrote:
Yeah, thanks for catching, that was a slip on my part. P3310's current wording will introduce the term 'strict pack match', so we could go ahead and also rename all of them to that on a follow up. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125372 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
