================ @@ -1841,15 +1841,21 @@ class ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl : public CXXRecordDecl, LLVM_PREFERRED_TYPE(TemplateSpecializationKind) unsigned SpecializationKind : 3; + /// When matching the primary template, have we matched any packs on the + /// parameter side, versus any non-packs on the argument side, in a context + /// where the opposite matching is also allowed? + bool MatchedPackOnParmToNonPackOnArg : 1; ---------------- cor3ntin wrote:
I know this has the same name as the one in `CheckTemplateArgumentInfo` but we should rename all of them to `MatchedNonPackArgumentWithPackParameter` or something like that (ie remove the `On`s) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125372 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
