rnk added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923#700708, @hfinkel wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923#700696, @rnk wrote: > > > Do you think it's worth indicating that the error can be suppressed with an > > explicit cast, or is that wasted space? > > > What might this look like? Also, I don't see a regression test for this. The warning only looks through implicit casts and paren exprs, so it could look like this: `f.two_bits = (unsigned)three_bits;` I added a test for it. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits