================
@@ -19213,6 +19213,29 @@ void Sema::ActOnFields(Scope *S, SourceLocation
RecLoc, Decl *EnclosingDecl,
if (Record && FD->getType().isVolatileQualified())
Record->setHasVolatileMember(true);
+ auto IsNonDependentBitField = [](const FieldDecl *FD) {
+ if (!FD->isBitField())
+ return false;
+ if (FD->getType()->isDependentType())
+ return false;
+ return true;
----------------
ojhunt wrote:
I think I did this intentionally as I sometimes feel like explicit true/false
returns are clearer, I'm happy with either Aaron or @Sirraide's suggestion but
I want to confirm that others don't have my clarity concerns :D
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117428
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
