================
@@ -203,9 +203,28 @@ def HasStdExtM : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasStdExtM()">,
// Atomic Extensions
+def FeatureStdExtZaamo
+ : RISCVExtension<"zaamo", 1, 0,
+ "'Zaamo' (Atomic Memory Operations)">;
+def HasStdExtAOrZaamo
+ : Predicate<"Subtarget->hasStdExtZaamo()">,
+ AssemblerPredicate<(any_of FeatureStdExtZaamo),
+ "'A' (Atomic Instructions) or "
+ "'Zaamo' (Atomic Memory Operations)">;
----------------
lenary wrote:
```suggestion
def HasStdExtZaamo
: Predicate<"Subtarget->hasStdExtZaamo()">,
AssemblerPredicate<(any_of FeatureStdExtZaamo),
"'Zaamo' (Atomic Memory Operations)">;
```
Can we (eventually) do this cleanup (and similar for `HasStdExtAOrZalrsc`).
Probably not in this PR, but it's nicer when the names and descriptions of the
predicates line up closer with the extensions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116907
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
