philnik777 wrote: > > I went for only adding `[[clang::no_specialization]]` to function > > templates, since the other cases seem even more unlikely to me and seem to > > have a higher implementation complexity. Is that OK? > > Your test coverage also handles class templates and variable templates in > addition to function templates, which I think covers the most common cases > and is fine.
Ah, yes, I meant "I only added function templates in addition to class and variable templates (which was the original set)". https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
