AaronBallman wrote:

> I went for only adding `[[clang::no_specialization]]` to function templates, 
> since the other cases seem even more unlikely to me and seem to have a higher 
> implementation complexity. Is that OK?

Your test coverage also handles class templates and variable templates in 
addition to function templates, which I think covers the most common cases and 
is fine.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to