AaronBallman wrote: > I went for only adding `[[clang::no_specialization]]` to function templates, > since the other cases seem even more unlikely to me and seem to have a higher > implementation complexity. Is that OK?
Your test coverage also handles class templates and variable templates in addition to function templates, which I think covers the most common cases and is fine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits