JonPsson1 wrote: > I looked to see how hard it would be to lower the clang type... seems like > it's not hard. Pushed #113506. Let me know what you think. > > If there's some complication I'm not seeing, I think your suggested API in > the current version of this patch makes sense... but using clang types seems > much easier on the caller side.
I think that seems to work well, thanks. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111740 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
