efriedma-quic wrote: I looked to see how hard it would be to lower the clang type... seems like it's not hard. Pushed #113506. Let me know what you think.
If there's some complication I'm not seeing, I think your suggested API in the current version of this patch makes sense... but using clang types seems much easier on the caller side. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111740 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
