boomanaiden154 wrote: > True, however for libc++ the benefits are smaller because we run only libc++ > specific job in the BuildKite job. I've never had trouble with figuring out > what part of a job has caused failures. Either way, like I said I'm fine with > the patch, it seems like an improvement.
Ah, okay. That would make sense. > No, but someone has to remember and actually take the time to do the cleanup. > I also 100% support the removal of unused options and I've done things like > that in the past, but it doesn't happen unless someone decides to make it > their task. That's true. It is definitely tech debt when things like that are suddenly not used, but it is theoretically not too difficult to pull out at that point. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113447 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
