rampitec wrote:

I actually wish a better way to have overloaded builtins in clang. I do not 
believe any user of these builtins is expecting that a wide integer will be 
silently truncated, and any fp will go through fptosi and backwards after, like 
we do now. We have much more builtins like that, which are supposed to work on 
a raw data and do not really take data type into account. Permute, swizzle, you 
name it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112447
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to