arsenm wrote: > I actually wish a better way to have overloaded builtins in clang. I do not > believe any user of these builtins is expecting that a wide integer will be > silently truncated, and any fp will go through fptosi and backwards after, > like we do now.
Yes, C was a mistake https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112447 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
