jhuber6 wrote: > It seems to me like this should be done through the LTO interface and driven > through `lld`. I can understand if an intermediate step is required while the > SPIR-V backend is under development, but clang shouldn't be in the business > of linking, and generally neither should llvm-link. > > I'd be curious for @MaskRay's perspective too.
I don't think `lld` makes sense, but you can definitely use the LTO interface inside of this tool to create a similar effect. That should also get rid of the need for this `--device-library` thing because then it'll just internalize anything that's unused. That is, if the SYCL folks write their runtimes correctly with hidden visibility on device functions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112245 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
