================
@@ -9290,6 +9290,8 @@ def warn_unused_result_typedef_unsupported_spelling : 
Warning<
 def warn_unused_volatile : Warning<
   "expression result unused; assign into a variable to force a volatile load">,
   InGroup<DiagGroup<"unused-volatile-lvalue">>;
+def note_nodiscard_specified_here : Note<
----------------
Mick235711 wrote:

That note currently reads:
```
def note_availability_specified_here : Note<
  "%0 has been explicitly marked "
  "%select{unavailable|deleted|deprecated}1 here">;
```
Currently, this is the combined note used for unavailable, deleted, and 
deprecated, and the flavor is chosen by a number (0/1/2) passed as the second 
argument. Probably, if we want to reuse this, that should be changed to a 
string parameter?


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112289
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to