[clang] [clang] Generate note on declaration for nodiscard-related attributes (PR #112289)

[Erich Keane via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -302,27 +312,38 @@ void Sema::DiagnoseUnusedExprResult(const Stmt *S, 
unsigned DiagID) {
     if (const Decl *FD = CE->getCalleeDecl()) {
       if (ShouldSuppress)
         return;
-      if (FD->hasAttr<PureAttr>()) {
+      if (const auto *A = FD->getAttr<PureAttr>()) {
         Diag(Loc, diag::warn_unused_call) << R1 << R2 << "pure";
+        if (OffendingDecl && !OffendingDecl->getIdentifier()->getBuiltinID())
----------------
erichkeane wrote:

This situation of an offending decl not being always present is, imo, not 
really something we should be ok with.  As far as skipping on builtins, I don't 
know if we SHOULD, I would think the note there is still meaningful.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112289
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits