dwblaikie wrote:

Thanks @jimingham - yeah, that makes sense. My original argument for being OK 
with the de-canonicalization of typedefs was that they aren't load bearing 
anyway. But if lldb puts load on them, that assumption doesn't hold.

Yeah, could check for angles or template parameter DIEs and cache 
typedef->prettyprinter only if none of those features appear.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to