mylai-mtk wrote: @MaskRay Sure, I also agree that `!cfi_type` is a too general name and covers too little possibility for its name. I picked this approach instead of adding RISC-V-specific metadata nodes just to avoid adding RISC-V specifics to the conceptually backend-neutral LLVM IR. However, if this approach looks too general, maybe it's better to just use RISC-V-specific metadata nodes. (I'm closing this PR then, since it's not a good idea.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109080 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
