MaskRay wrote: I understand the intention to generalize naming, but I feel that there is significance chance that the over-generalization may not work with the alternative CFI schemes, and this change could turn out to be needed when the other schemes go with different IR constructs.
I feel that we should make such renaming at this time. BTW: when kcfi was proposed, I felt that it was not a good name because the strategy could only cover a very limited subset of LTO-based `-fsanitize=cfi`. kcfi is just like a brand name. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109080 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
