cor3ntin wrote:
> @cor3ntin See the discussion on #95917. This is likely effectively dead code,
> but nobody is certain enough of that to delete it outright...
The original issue seems to suggest the code path can be used on invalid code
such as
````
struct X {
};
void foo() {
X<P>;
}
```
(ie a bogus template-name that is not annotated)
We might test that - and see that the errors make a bit of sense/don't regress
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109298
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
