asb wrote: I think our conclusion from the sync-up call discussion matches what we'd roughly concluded in this thread, which is that with an instantiation of Hazard3 shipping in the RP2350 this isn't really a good test case for questions about when it's worth including a CPU definition for an open source core.
So for this particular PR, we just need a name people are happy with (perhaps check if the vendor has a preference?). Something like `-mcpu=rp2350-hazard3` perhaps? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102452 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
