Sirraide wrote: > I think it would be fine and probably preferable to do that feature in stages > / multiple PRS
That makes sense to me, yeah. So the next step would be supporting dependent friend declarations properly, I take it? I.e. cases such as ```c++ template <typename T> friend class Foo<T>::Nested; ``` And yeah, in that case, I’ll remove the release note etc. for now. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
