cor3ntin wrote: > So after talking over some of the more horrible edge cases w/ Corentin for a > while, it looks like implementing this requires supporting unexpanded packs > in nested name specifiers, which we don’t, but he has a patch for that, so > I’ll be taking a look at that next.
I think it would be fine and probably preferable to do that feature in stages / multiple PRS 1. This 2. Nested dependent non-pack friends 3. Packs This is big enough to review (If we go that way we can remove the changelog/cxx_status/feature test macro for now) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101448 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
