mizvekov wrote: > I'm not sure I follow. If we "treat the `<0>` as a template argument list, > even if it isn't unambiguously a template argument list.", then aren't > applying CWG1835 at all.
Yes, in that case. But I am arguing for selectively applying it. I thought that could work, but I am not sure, that's what I am asking. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
