mizvekov wrote: > @mizvekov Without unannotated tentative parsing (to be _properly_ introduced > by #96364), issuing a warning is infeasible. Either way, by the time we > detect the error we could be who knows how deep into the second operand of a > `>` operator.
So when we are parsing `this->A`. Suppose what follows it looks like a template argument list. Then we see if `this->template A` would have found a template. if it does find the template `A`, we issue the warning and proceed as if the user had written `this->template A` Do you think that's workable? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
