================
@@ -12114,6 +12115,35 @@ static void NoteFunctionCandidate(Sema &S,
OverloadCandidate *Cand,
return;
}
+ // If this is an implicit deduction guide against an implicitly defined
+ // constructor, add a note for it. Neither these deduction guides nor their
+ // corresponding constructors are explicitly spelled in the source code,
----------------
hokein wrote:
I have a different perspective: I'd prefer printing them as long as they are
synthesized (not part of the written source code).
While the example of combined template parameters might not be the best one
(and I agree that understanding them from existing contexts is often
sufficient), the conjunction of associated constraints for a class and the
corresponding constructor is probably less obvious. I think printing them would
make the situation clearer and help users avoid guessing. Moreover, this
approach would be consistent with what GCC does.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
