================
@@ -12114,6 +12115,35 @@ static void NoteFunctionCandidate(Sema &S,
OverloadCandidate *Cand,
return;
}
+ // If this is an implicit deduction guide against an implicitly defined
+ // constructor, add a note for it. Neither these deduction guides nor their
+ // corresponding constructors are explicitly spelled in the source code,
----------------
hokein wrote:
Any reason to filter out the "explicit constructor" case? We still synthesize a
deduction guide from a constructor, and they are not identical, e.g. its
template parameters is a combination of template parameters of the class and
template parameters of the corresponding constructor. I think it is useful to
print them as well.
I think a simple model here would be that we always print synthesized deduction
guides (this covers the using-alias case.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
