=?utf-8?q?Iñaki?= Amatria Barral <inaki.amat...@appentra.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94...@github.com>
================
@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@
// GCNO-LOCATION: "-coverage-notes-file={{.*}}/foo/bar.gcno"
// GCNO-LOCATION-REL: "-coverage-notes-file={{.*}}{{/|\\\\}}foo/bar.gcno"
-/// GCC allows PWD to change the paths.
-// RUN: %if system-linux %{ PWD=/proc/self/cwd %clang -### -c --coverage %s -o
foo/bar.o 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=PWD %s %}
-// PWD: "-coverage-notes-file=/proc/self/cwd/foo/bar.gcno"
"-coverage-data-file=/proc/self/cwd/foo/bar.gcda"
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Sure! Basically, you'd write a post in https://discourse.llvm.org/ with a title
along the lines of `[RFC]; stop using PWD in current_path` and some explanation
of what you'd like to change, why, and what the impacts are. Folks will leave
comments in the post about things you should also consider, and eventually
discussion dies down and we (hopefully) have clear direction on what to do from
there.
I would recommend posting this RFC in the [Clang
category](https://discourse.llvm.org/c/clang/6) though it's possible the
changes could impact other projects.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94544
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
