================
@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@
// GCNO-LOCATION: "-coverage-notes-file={{.*}}/foo/bar.gcno"
// GCNO-LOCATION-REL: "-coverage-notes-file={{.*}}{{/|\\\\}}foo/bar.gcno"
-/// GCC allows PWD to change the paths.
-// RUN: %if system-linux %{ PWD=/proc/self/cwd %clang -### -c --coverage %s -o
foo/bar.o 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=PWD %s %}
-// PWD: "-coverage-notes-file=/proc/self/cwd/foo/bar.gcno"
"-coverage-data-file=/proc/self/cwd/foo/bar.gcda"
----------------
inaki-amatria wrote:
Thank you for the timely response and for raising this important concern.
I understand the importance of maintaining consistent behavior in Clang, and I
certainly do not wish to introduce changes that might silently break existing
build scripts.
Could you please guide me on how to initiate the RFC process? I would like to
ensure that we address this issue appropriately.
Thank you again for your insights, and I look forward to your guidance on
progressing with the RFC.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94544
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
