rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:4556-4558
+ "%0 is a %select{non-tag type|typedef|type alias|template|type alias "
+ "template|template template argument}1 that cannot be referenced with a "
+ "%select{struct|interface|union|class|enum}2 tag">;
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> "tag" is C terminology that C++ doesn't share; "specifier" would be correct
> in both languages.
>
> Also, this wording suggests that *some* templates / template template
> arguments / ... can be referenced by, say, a `struct` specifier. How about:
>
> %select{non-struct type|non-class type|non-union type|non-enum
> type|typedef|type alias|template|[...]}1 %0 cannot be referenced with
> %select{struct|interface|union|class|enum}2 specifier
>
> (where we use "non-enum type" when the tag is `enum`, "non-union type" when
> the tag is `union`, and otherwise use "non-struct type" in C and "non-class
> type" in C++)?
OK, sounds good.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
