rsmith added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:4556-4558
+ "%0 is a %select{non-tag type|typedef|type alias|template|type alias "
+ "template|template template argument}1 that cannot be referenced with a "
+ "%select{struct|interface|union|class|enum}2 tag">;
----------------
"tag" is C terminology that C++ doesn't share; "specifier" would be correct in
both languages.
Also, this wording suggests that *some* templates / template template arguments
/ ... can be referenced by, say, a `struct` specifier. How about:
%select{non-struct type|non-class type|non-union type|non-enum
type|typedef|type alias|template|[...]}1 %0 cannot be referenced with
%select{struct|interface|union|class|enum}2 specifier
(where we use "non-enum type" when the tag is `enum`, "non-union type" when the
tag is `union`, and otherwise use "non-struct type" in C and "non-class type"
in C++)?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
