petrhosek wrote: > > I'm trying to implement support for building libunwind, libc++abi and > > libc++ against LLVM libc in which case we won't be able to rely on > > `-nostdlib++`, we'll need to use `-nostdlib` to avoid linking the C > > library. We can still use `-nostdlib++` when LLVM libc isn't being used > > used, but a lot of this logic will need to be refactored to support the new > > use case. With that in mind, I'm fine with change as an interim solution. > > Is there a reason why `-nostdlib` also drops compiler-rt? If `-nostdlib++` > affects only the C++ library, it would make sense that `-nostdlib` affects > only the C library?
The reason is matching the behavior of GCC, but given that I don't think we can change the current semantics. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75089 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
