ldionne wrote: > I'm trying to implement support for building libunwind, libc++abi and libc++ > against LLVM libc in which case we won't be able to rely on `-nostdlib++`, > we'll need to use `-nostdlib` to avoid linking the C library. We can still > use `-nostdlib++` when LLVM libc isn't being used used, but a lot of this > logic will need to be refactored to support the new use case. With that in > mind, I'm fine with change as an interim solution.
Is there a reason why `-nostdlib` also drops compiler-rt? If `-nostdlib++` affects only the C++ library, it would make sense that `-nostdlib` affects only the C library? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75089 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
