spatel added inline comments.
> mehdi_amini wrote in CGCall.cpp:1735 > I think I remember folks being against FMF on calls (Chris Lattner?), I'll > try to find the relevant discussion. > Otherwise your plan seems fine to me! Yes - Chris was opposed to FMF on intrinsics (preferring parameters/metadata as the delivery mechanism instead) in 2012: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121217/159446.html ...which you mentioned and I replied to in the post-commit thread when I added FMF to any FPMathOperator calls earlier this year: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160104/323154.html There were no replies to that thread on llvm-dev since my January post. I will re-post the question to llvm-dev before proceeding. https://reviews.llvm.org/D24815 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
