spatel added inline comments.
> echristo wrote in CGCall.cpp:1735 > Would be nice to get these pulled into a single fast-math string that's set > and then used all over for sure. :) I'm probably not imagining some use case, but I was hoping that we can just delete the 4 (fast/inf/nan/nsz) that are already covered by instruction-level FMF. An auto-upgrade might be needed within LLVM...and/or a big pile of regression test changes? https://reviews.llvm.org/D24815 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
