================
@@ -106,9 +111,14 @@ static void emitSCSEpilogue(MachineFunction &MF, 
MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
           CSI, [&](CalleeSavedInfo &CSR) { return CSR.getReg() == RAReg; }))
     return;
 
+  const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = STI.getInstrInfo();
+  if (STI.hasFeature(RISCV::FeatureStdExtZicfiss)) {
----------------
topperc wrote:

> Today, if you use software SCS on a platform without support they just fail, 
> since the SCS won't be setup and gp(probably) points to invalid memory. Is it 
> unreasonable to have it work the same in this case?

If the hardware shadow stack isn't set up, won't the instructions become silent 
NOPs rather than failing?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68075
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to