dwblaikie wrote: FWIW, I think we also saw, internally at Google, some significant and surprising (growth in sections, like .debug_loclists and .debug_gnu_pubnames/types) that were a bit surprising/not what I'd have expected of the original committed/reverted patch.
Could you run a clang build with/without this patch, and compare the two files using `bloaty` ( https://github.com/google/bloaty ) or similar - some comparison of the % growth of each section to see how these patches are affecting debug info size? (patch itself sounds OK/looks good) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68986 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
