dwblaikie wrote: > > FWIW, I think we also saw, internally at Google, some significant and > > surprising (growth in sections, like .debug_loclists and > > .debug_gnu_pubnames/types) that were a bit surprising/not what I'd have > > expected of the original committed/reverted patch. > > Could you run a clang build with/without this patch, and compare the two > > files using `bloaty` ( https://github.com/google/bloaty ) or similar - some > > comparison of the % growth of each section to see how these patches are > > affecting debug info size? > > (patch itself sounds OK/looks good) > > I haven't mentioned any significant change in the total debug info size. The > full size of the debug info sections of clang executable file has increased > by less than 1%. The size of the debug info sections of test-suite object > files has also increased by 0,02% in total.
Hmm - we saw some much larger swings internally, but hopefully something just got confused... I may need to test/look into it in more detail. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68986 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
