================
@@ -366,26 +366,50 @@ StringRef ARM::getArchExtFeature(StringRef ArchExt) {
}
static ARM::FPUKind findDoublePrecisionFPU(ARM::FPUKind InputFPUKind) {
+ if (InputFPUKind == ARM::FK_INVALID || InputFPUKind == ARM::FK_NONE)
+ return ARM::FK_INVALID;
+
+ const ARM::FPUName &InputFPU = ARM::FPUNames[InputFPUKind];
+
+ if (ARM::isDoublePrecision(InputFPU.Restriction))
+ return InputFPUKind;
+
+ // Otherwise, look for an FPU entry with all the same fields, except
+ // that it supports double precision.
+ for (const ARM::FPUName &CandidateFPU : ARM::FPUNames) {
+ if (CandidateFPU.FPUVer == InputFPU.FPUVer &&
+ CandidateFPU.NeonSupport == InputFPU.NeonSupport &&
+ ARM::has32Regs(CandidateFPU.Restriction) ==
+ ARM::has32Regs(InputFPU.Restriction) &&
+ ARM::isDoublePrecision(CandidateFPU.Restriction)) {
+ return CandidateFPU.ID;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // nothing found
+ return ARM::FK_INVALID;
+}
+
+static ARM::FPUKind findSinglePrecisionFPU(ARM::FPUKind InputFPUKind) {
+ if (InputFPUKind == ARM::FK_INVALID || InputFPUKind == ARM::FK_NONE)
+ return ARM::FK_INVALID;
+
const ARM::FPUName &InputFPU = ARM::FPUNames[InputFPUKind];
// If the input FPU already supports double-precision, then there
// isn't any different FPU we can return here.
----------------
domin144 wrote:
Indeed. Thanks for spotting this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67412
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
