================
@@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ void test_range_0_15(svbool_t pg, void *ptr) {
SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svst1_ver_vnum_za8,,,)(0, -1, 16, pg, ptr, 1);
// expected-error@+1 {{argument value 16 is outside the valid range [0, 15]}}
- SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svldr_vnum_za,,,)(-1, 16, ptr);
+ SVE_ACLE_FUNC(svldr_vnum_za,,,)(-1, ptr, 16);
----------------
sdesmalen-arm wrote:
Not something to fix in this patch, but we shouldn't be adding limits to the
vnum parameter, or even require it to be a constant/immediate, because the SVE
_vnum intrinsics also don't require this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65593
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
